Teaching Academic Writing in Iranian EFL Classrooms: Teacher-initiated Comments or Peer-provided Feedback?

Research in English Language Pedagogy

مقاله 7، دوره 1، شماره 2، خرداد 2014، صفحه 58-65   

نوع مقاله: Original Article

نویسندگان

Saeed Ketabi؛ Reza Torabi^*

Department of English, Faculty of Foreign Languages, University of Isfahan

چکیده

This research study aimed at investigating whether using peer-provided feedbacks rather than teacher-provided comments would result in any significance difference in Iranian English undergraduate students’ ability in writing. In so doing, based on a pretest (an OPT & a writing exam), 40 subjects were assigned to two
homogeneous groups of equal number the subjects in the control group received more traditional form of feedback i.e., Teacher’s Written Comments (TW) and
those in the experimental group who received the alternative: Peers’ Written Comments (PW). The students were required to write ten paragraphs, five pairs,
on each topic, one before receiving feedback and another, the revised version, after the feedback. The analyses of the data revealed that peer feedback--in its
general sense--affects students’ writing performances, which in turn means that the students do incorporate suggestions made by their teacher and/or peers while
revising their drafts. In sum, Peer-reviews in the form of comments and suggestions given by the students on one another’s drafts proved beneficial.

کلیدواژه‌ها

English writing؛ Peer-provided feedbacks؛ Teacher-provided comments؛ Iranian EFL learners

مراجع

Amores, M. J. (1997). A new perspective on peer-editing. Foreign Language Annals, 30(4), 513-523.
Ashwell, T. (2000). Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom: Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method? Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(3), 227-257.
Badger, R., & White, G. (2000). A process genre approach to teaching writing. ELT Journal, 54(2), 153-161.

Bailey, E. P., & Powell, P. A. (1989). The practical writer with readings. New  York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
Bartels, N. (2003). Written peer response in L2 writing. English Teaching Forum,
       41(1), 34-36.
Byrd, R. D. (2003). Practical tips for implementing peer editing tasks in the foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 36(3), 434-439. Caulk, N. (1994). Comparing teacher and student responses to written work.
       TESOL Quarterly, 28(1), 181-188.
Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement
        in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language
 Writing, 12, 267-296.
Connor, U., & Asenavage, K. (1994). Peer response groups in ESL writing classes:
       How much impact on revision? Journal of Second Language Writing, 3(3),
       257-276.
Cresswell, A. (2000). Self-monitoring in student writing: Developing learner  responsibility. ELT Journal, 54(3), 235-244.
Dheram, P. K. (1995). Feedback as a two-bullock cart: A case study of teaching  writing. ELT Journal, 49(2), 160-168.
Ferris, D. R. (1995). Student reactions to teacher response in multiple-draft
       composition classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 33-53.
Ferris, D. R. (1997). The influence of teacher commentary on student revision.  TESOL Quarterly, 31(2), 315-339.
Ferris, D. R., & Roberts, B. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes. How
         explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(3), 161-
         184.
Fitzgerald, S. H. (1993). Essay writing simplified. New York: HarperCollins College Publishers.
Gascoigne, C. (2004). Examining the effect of feedback in beginning L2 composition. Foreign Language Annals, 37(1), 71-76.
Han, Z. (2002). Rethinking the role of corrective feedback in communicative  language teaching. RELC Journal, 33(1), 1-25.
Keh, C. L. (1990). Feedback in the writing process: A model and methods for  implementation. ELT Journal, 44(4), 294-304.
Liu, J., & Hansen, J. G. (2002). Peer response in second language writing  classrooms. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Makino, T. (1993). Learner self-correction in EFL written compositions. ELT
Journal, 47(4), 337-341.
Messenger, W. E., & Taylor, P. A. (1989). Essentials of writing. Scarborough,
        Ontario: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Muncie, J. (2000). Using written teacher feedback in EFL composition classes.
         ELT Journal, 54(1), 47-53.
Nezhad Ansari, D. (2002). Writing effective paragraphs: A step by step composition course. Isfahan: Kanoone Pazhoohesh Publication.
Paulus, T. M. (1999). The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing.
         Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(3), 265-289.
Roebuck, R. F. (2001). Teaching composition in the college level foreign
        language class: Insights and activities from sociocultural theory. Foreign
Language Annals, 34(3), 206-215.
Rollinson, P. (2005). Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class. ELT Journal,
        59(1), 23-30.
Sayyad Shirabad, J. (1999). The impact of teacher’s written comments on Iranian  EFL students’ revision. Unpublished MA Thesis, Islamic Azad University,
      Central Branch, Tehran, Iran.
Shin, S. J. (2003). The reflective L2 writing teacher. ELT Journal, 57(1), 3-10. Tahririan, M. H., & Mazdayasna, G. (2001). Peer-review, teacher feedback and
       EFL learners’ writing development. IJAL, 5(1), 55-67.
Villamil, O. S., & de Guerrero, M. C. M. (1996). Peer revision in the L2
        classroom: Social-cognitive activities, mediating strategies, and aspects of
       social behavior. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5(1), 51-75.
West, B. R. (1997). Talk your head off and write too. White Plains, NY: Prentice
       Hall Regents.
White, R., & Arndt, V. (1991). Process writing. London: Longman.
Youngs, B. L., & Green, A. (2001). A successful peer writing assistant program.  Foreign Language Annals, 34(6), 550-558.
Zareh Ekbatani, A. (2002). The impact of audiotaped feedback on Iranian EFL  learners’ writing skill. Unpublished MA Thesis. Islamic Azad University,
       Central Branch, Tehran, Iran.
Zhu, W. (2001). Interaction and feedback in mixed peer response groups. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 251-276.