The Effect of Explicit Theme-based Instruction on the Vocabulary Learning Performance of Iranian EFL Learners

Journal of Teaching English Lnaguage Studies

مقاله 4، دوره 6، شماره 4، شهریور 2018، صفحه 64-75   

نویسنده

Parastoo Alizadeh Oghyanous^*

Faculty of Foreign Languages, ,Kharazmi University, Tehran

چکیده

Vocabulary has been one of the main components of foreign language learning and still many
believe that vocabulary knowledge is the most essential part of language ability. The present study
aimed at investigating the effect of explicit instruction through theme-based instruction on the
vocabulary learning of EFL learners. The participants of the study included 72 Iranian EFL
learners, half of whom served as the experimental and the other half as the control group.
Vocabulary knowledge of the participants was measured using the Vocabulary Level Test by
Cambridge University before and after the treatment. The results of statistical analysis indicated
that both explicit instruction through text thematiztion and regular teaching of vocabulary were
effective on the learning of vocabulary but explicit instruction through text-theme procedure had
a significantly better effect compared to regular instruction on the learning of the new vocabulary
items.

کلیدواژه‌ها

explicit instruction؛ text’s theme؛ Vocabulary؛ vocabulary instruction

مراجع

Boers, F., & Lindstromberg, S. (2008). How cognitive linguistics can foster effective vocabulary
teaching. In F. Boers & S. Lindstromberg (Eds.), Applications of cognitive linguistics:
Congitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology (pp. 1-61).
Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Carstairs-MacCarthy, A. (2002). An introduction to English morphology. Edinburg: Edinburg
University Press.
Celce-Murcia, & M., Rosensweig, F. (1989). Teaching vocabulary in the ESL classroom. In M.
Celce-Murcia, & L. McIntosh (Eds.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language,
1st edn. New York, Newbury House Publishers Inc.
Coyne, M. D., McCoach, D. B., & Kapp, S. (2007). Vocabulary intervention for kindergarten
students: Comparing extended instruction to embedded instruction and incidental
exposure. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 30(1), 74–88.
Davis, J. N. (1989). Facilitating effects of marginal glosses on foreign language reading, The
Modern Language Journal, 73(1), 41-48.
Decarrico, J. S. (2001). Vocabulary learning and teaching. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching
English as a second or foreign language (3rd ed.) (pp. 285-299). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
Dejica-Cartis, D., & Cozma, M. (2013). ‘Using theme-rheme analysis for improving coherence
and cohesion in target-texts: a methodological approach’. In Procedia – Social and
Behavioral Sciences, 84(9), 890-894.
Elleman, A. M., Lindo, E. J., Morphy, P., & Compton, D. L. (2009). The impact of vocabulary
instruction on passage level comprehension of school age children: A meta-analysis.
Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2(1), 1–44.
Fries, P. H. (1981). ‘On the status of theme in English: arguments from discourse.’ Forum
Linguisticum, 6(1), 1–38.
Gass, S. M. (1999). Discussion: Incidental vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language
Acquisition, 21(3), 319–333.
Gonzalez, B., & Paola, A. (2011). Fostering fifth graders’ reading comprehension through the use
of intensive reading in physical science. Colombia Applied Linguistics Journal, 13(1), 35-
53.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar (1st edn.). London: Edward
Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. (Second edition). London:
Edward Arnold.
Hawes, T., & Thomas, S. (2012). Theme choice in EAP and media language. Journal of English
for academic purposes, 11(2), 175-183.
Hewings, A, (2004). ‘Developing discipline-specific writing: an analysis of undergraduate
geography essays.’ In Ravelli L J & Ellis R A (eds.) Analysing academic writing:
contextualised frameworks. (pp. 131–152). London and New York: Continuum.
Hunt, K. (1965). Grammatical structures written at three grade levels. Champaign, IL: NCTE.
Kies, D. (1986). ‘Marked themes with and without pronominal reinforcement.’ In Steiner E &
Veltman R (eds.) Pragmatics, discourse, and text. (pp. 47–75). London: Pinter Publishers.
Krashen, S. (1989).We acquire vocabulary and spelling by reading: Additional evidence for the
input hypothesis. The Modern Language Journal, 73(4), 440–464.
Laufer, B. (1997). The development of L2 lexis in the expression of the advanced learner. The
Modern Language Journal, 75(4), 440‐448.
Martin, J. R. (1992). English text: system and structure. Philadelphia and Amsterdam: John
Benjamins.
Maynard, K. L., Pullen, P. C., & Coyne, M. D. (2010). Teaching vocabulary to first-grade students
through repeated shared storybook reading: A comparison of rich and basic instruction to
incidental exposure. Literacy Research and Instruction, 49(3), 209-242.
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge, England:
Cambridge University Press.
Salemi, A., Rabiee, M., & Ketabi, S. (2012). The Effects of Explicit/Implicit Instruction and
Feedback on the Development of Persian EFL Learners‟ Pragmatic Competence in
Suggestion Structures. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 3(1), 188-199.
Schiffrin, D. (1985). Multiple constraints on discourse options: a quantitative analysis of causal
sequences. Discourse Processes 8(3), 281–303.
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics,
11(2), 129-158.
Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction
(pp. 3 – 32). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Schmitt, N. (2002). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stein, M. J. (1993). The healthy inadequacy of contextual definition. In T. Huckin, M. Haynes, &
J. Coady (Eds.), Second language reading and vocabulary learning (pp. 203–212).
Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex.
Stern, H. H. (1992). Issues and options in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Thompson, S. (1985). ‘Initial vs. final purpose clauses in written English discourse.’ Text 5(1),
55–84.
Thompson, C. (2006). Using a language that’s not your own: Experiences of multilingual
employees. The Diversity Factor, 14(2), 30–36.
Vande Kopple, W. J. (1991). Themes, thematic progressions, and some implications for
understanding discourse. Written Communication 8(3), 311–347.
Wesche, M., & Paribakht, S. (1999). (eds.). Incidental L2 Vocabulary acquisition: Theory, current
research, and instructional implications [Special issue]. Studies in Second Language
Acquisition, 21(2), 127-138.
Zu, F. (2009). Using lexical approach to teach vocabulary. US-China Foreign Language, 7(8), 44-
47.