Models of EFL Learners’ Vocabulary Development: Spreading Activation vs. Hierarchical Network Model

Journal of Language and Translation

مقاله 7، دوره 9، شماره 1، فروردین 2019، صفحه 93-108   

نوع مقاله: Research Articles

نویسندگان

Gh Abbasian¹؛ Fatemeh Farokhi^{* 2}

¹English, Basic Sciences, Imam Ali University

²MA in TEFL, Faculty of Persian Literature and Foreign Languages, Islamic Azad University, South Tehran Branch, Iran

چکیده

Semantic network approaches view organization or representation of internal lexicon in the form of either spreading or hierarchical system identified, respectively, as Spreading Activation Model (SAM) and Hi- erarchical Network Model (HNM). However, the validity of either model is amongst the intact issues in the literature which can be studied through basing the instruction compatible with the principles of each model. In a bid to fill this gap, this study was designed to empirically verify the effectiveness of SAM compared to HNM in both developing and retention rate of vocabulary knowledge. To this end, 67 Ira- nian EFL learners were divided into two experimental groups (34 and 33) and one was exposed to HNM- based while the other to SAM-based vocabulary instruction for 10 sessions. In the light of group- comparison experimental design, the participants' both immediate achievement and long-term storage were measured through an immediate and a delayed post-tests, respectively. The parametric statistical analyses showed that the group being exposed to HNM-based instruction outperformed the other group in both the immediate and delayed post-tests. The findings bear two distinct messages: yielding support to more validity of HNM as a model of internal lexicon organization and supporting the educational implica- tions of cognitively compatible instruction of language components.

کلیدواژه‌ها

Hierarchical Network Model؛ Internal Lexicon؛ Spreading Activation Model؛ Vocabulary Development؛ Vocabulary Retention

مراجع

Aghlara, L., & Tamjid, N. H. (2011). The effect of digital games on Iranian children's vocabulary retention in foreign language acquisition. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 552-560.

Balota, D. A., & Chumbley, J. I. (1985). The locus of word-frequency effects in the pronunciation task: Lexical access and/or production? Journal of Memory and Language, 24(1), 89-106.

Beckage, N. M., & Colunga, E. (2016). Language networks as models of cognition: Understanding cognition through language Towards a Theoretical Framework for Analyzing Complex Linguistic Networks (pp. 3-28): Springer.

Bintz, W. P. (2011). Teaching vocabulary across the curriculum. Middle School Journal, 42(4), 44-53.

Boers, F. (2000). Metaphor awareness and vocabulary retention. Applied linguistics, 21(4), 553-571.

Böhm, U., & Mehlhorn, K. (2009). The influence of spreading activation on memory retrieval in sequential diagnostic reasoning. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Cognitive Modeling. Manchester, UK.

Carroll, D. W. (2006). Psychology of language: THOMSON.

Carroll, J.B., & White, M.N. (1973). Age-of acquisition norms for 220 picturable nouns. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal behaviour, 12, 563-576. 

Chen, S. M. (2012). Lexical organization in Mandarin-speaking children: Insights from the semantic fluency task. The University of Iowa.

Chiu, L.-L., & Liu, G.-Z. (2013). Effects of printed, pocket electronic, and online dictionaries on high school students’ English vocabulary retention. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22(4), 619-634.

Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological review, 82(6), 407.

Collins, A. M., & Quillian, M. R. (1969). Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 8(2), 240-247.

Collins, A. M., & Quillian, M. R. (1972). How to make a language user.

Crestani, F. (1997). Application of spreading activation techniques in information retrieval. Artificial Intelligence Review, 11(6), 453-482.

Daskalovska, N. (2014). Incidental vocabulary acquisition from reading an authentic text. The Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 14(2), 201-216.

Forster, K. I. (1981). Frequency blocking and lexical access: One mental lexicon or two? Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 20(2), 190-203.

Grace, C. A. (2000). Gender differences: Vocabulary retention and access to translations for beginning language learners in CALL. The Modern Language Journal, 84(2), 214-224.

Harmon, J. M., Wood, K. D., Hedrick, W. B., Vintinner, J., & Willeford, T. (2009). Interactive word walls: More than just reading the writing on the walls. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52(5), 398-408.

He, H., & Deng, Y. (2015). The mental lexicon and English vocabulary teaching. English Language Teaching, 8(7), 40.

Jastrzembski, J. E. (1981). Multiple meanings, number of related meanings, frequency of occurrence, and the lexicon. Cognitive psychology, 13(2), 278-305.

Jones, M. N., Willits, J., Dennis, S., & Jones, M. (2015). Models of semantic memory. Oxford handbook of mathematical and computational psychology, 232-254.

Juhasz, B.J. (2005). Age-of -acquisition effects in word and picture identification. Psychlogical Bulletin. 131, 684-712

Kavitha, V., & Kannan, S. P. (2017). Investigating the Lexical Networks in the Vocabulary of Indian ESL Learners. IUP Journal of English Studies, 12(1), 21.

Kitajima, R. (2001). The effect of instructional conditions on students' vocabulary retention. Foreign Language Annals, 34(5), 470-482.

Landauer, T. K., & Freedman, J. L. (1968). Information retrieval from long-term memory: Category size and recognition time. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 7(2), 291-295.

 

Min, H. T. (2008). EFL vocabulary acquisition and retention: Reading plus vocabulary enhancement activities and narrow reading. Language Learning, 58(1), 73-115.

Miyake, M., Joyce, T., Jung, J., & Akama, H. (2007). Hierarchical structure in semantic networks of Japanese word associations. In Proceedings of the 21st Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation (pp. 321-329).

Prince, P. (1996). Second language vocabulary learning: The role of context versus translations as a function of proficiency. The Modern Language Journal, 80(4), 478-493.

Pulido, D. (2003). Modeling the role of second language proficiency and topic familiarity in second language incidental vocabulary acquisition through reading. Language learning, 53(2), 233-284.

Pulido, D. (2004). The relationship between text comprehension and second language incidental vocabulary acquisition: A matter of topic familiarity? Language Learning, 54(3), 469-523.

Richards, J. C., & Renandya, W. A. (2002). Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice: Cambridge university press.

Soyoof, A., Jokar, M., Razavizadegan, M. A., & Morovat, E. (2014). The Effects of Learners’ Brain Hemisphericity on their Degree of Vocabulary Retention: A Case Study of Iranian High School Students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1844-1849.

Webb, S., & Chang, A. C.-S. (2015). How does prior word knowledge affect vocabulary learning progress in an extensive reading program? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37(4), 651-675.