Bio‑digestion and post‑treatment of effluents by bio‑fermentation, an opportunity for energy uses and generation of organic fertilizers from bovine manure

International Journal of Recycling Organic Waste in Agriculture

مقاله 10، دوره 8، شماره 4، اسفند 2019، صفحه 431-438   

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.1007/s40093-019-0275-5

نویسندگان

Luis Antonio Barzallo-Bravo^{* 1}؛ David Carrera-Villacrés²؛ Rafael Eduardo Vargas-Verdesoto³؛ Lourdes Karina Ponce-Loaiza³؛ Modesto Correoso²؛ Álvaro Petronio Gavilanes-Quishpi³

¹Facultad de Ingeniería en Geología, Minas Petróleos y Ambiental (FIGEMPA), Carrera de Ingeniería Ambiental, Universidad Central del Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador

²Departamento de Ciencias de la Tierra y la Construcción, Universidad de las Fuerzas Armadas ESPE, Sangolquí, Ecuador

³Departamento de Biotecnología, Universidad de las Fuerzas Armadas ESPE, Sangolquí, Ecuador

چکیده

Purpose Bio-fermentation has been routed as a viable alternative for the treatment of organic waste, which can provide renewable energy and can return nutrients to the soil with its byproducts. In this context, the objectives of the research were to analyze the benefits that a plastic plug-flow bio-digester can provide for treatment of bovine manure; and through biofermentation to control the E. coli number present in the bio-digester effluents.
Methods The concentration of macronutrients and amount of the E. coli in the effluent was determined by the methods of analysis purposed by APHA standard methods and AOAC standard methods, respectively. In addition, the percentage composition of biogas was analyzed for determining the operative of the system.
Results The production of biogas showed of 52.55% mol of methane concentration which it fed one blowtorch and one kitchenette. The bio-digester effluents showed appreciable amounts of nitrogen, potassium, phosphates, calcium, magnesium and sodium but with E. coli presence; the reason why the bio-digester effluent was treated later by a second fermentation inoculated with mountain effective microorganism, post-treatment which eliminated in 100% E. coli presence.
Conclusion Both processes showed the viability as treatment of the bovine manure which brings renewable energy and effluents with nutritive loads to use it as a biofertilizer without risks to health and humanity. The project was located at the tropical zone into the Choco forest, at an average altitude of 1110 m above sea level and an average temperature annual of 21–22 °C.

کلیدواژه‌ها

Plastic plug-flow bio-digester ؛ Biogas ؛ E. coli ؛ Biofertilizers ؛ Mountain effective microorganisms

مراجع

Adetoye A, Pinloche E, Adeniyi B, Ayeni F (2018) Characterization and anti-salmonella activities of lactic acid bacteria isolated from cattle faeces. BMC Microbiol 18:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/ s12866-018-1248-y

Akopyan K, Trchounian A (2006) Escherichia coli membrane proton conductance and proton efux depend on growth pH and are sensitive to osmotic stress. Cell Biochem Biophys 46:201–208. https:// doi.org/10.1385/cbb:46:3:201

Alvarez-Sieiro P, Montalbán-López M, Dongdong M, Kuipers O (2016) Bacteriocins of lactic acid bacteria: extending the family. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 100:2939–2951. https://doi. org/10.1007/s00253-016-7343-9

 Argüello-Arias H (1996) Dinámica de la producción y descomposición del matillo de bosque muy húmedo tropical del bajo Calima, en el valle del Cauca. Agron Colomb 13:198–214

Campo-Martínez A, Acosta-Sánchez R, Morales-Velasco S, Prado FY (2014) Evaluación de microorganismos de montaña (MM) en la producción de acelga en la meseta de Popayán. Biotecnol Sect Agropecu Agroind 12:79–87

 Criollo H, Lagos T, Piarpuezan E, Pérez Ruth (2011) The efect of three liquid bio-fertilizers in the production of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) and cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata). Agron Colomb 29:415–421

 Dublein D, Steinhauser A (2008) Biogas from waste and renewable resources: an introduction. Wiley, Weinheim, Germany

FAO (1992) Biogas process for sustainable development. MIGAL Galilee Technological Centre, Kiryat

Shmona Fatunbi A, Ncube L (2009) Activities of efective microorganism (EM) on the nutrient dynamics of diferent organic materials applied to soil. Am Euroasian J Agron 2:26–35

Hammes W, Hertel C (2009) Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology: volume three the frmicute. Springer, Berlin

Koneswaran G, Nierenberg D (2008) Global farm animal production and global warming: impacting and mitigating climate change. Environ Health Perspect 116:578–582. https://doi.org/10.1289/ ehp.11034

Martí-Herrero J (2008) Biodisgestores familiares guía de diseño y manual de instalación. GTZ Energía, Bolivia Martí-Herrero J (2011) Reduced hydraulic retention times in low-cost tubular digesters: two issues. Biomass Bioenerg 35:4481–4484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.07.020

Medina VA, Quipuzco UL, Juscamaita MJ (2015) Evaluación de la calidad de biol de segunda generación de estiércol de ovino producido a través de biodigestores. An Cient 76:116–124. https:// doi.org/10.21704/ac.v76i1.772

MIERGIA/PNUD/FAO/GEF (2011) Manual de Biogás. Proyecto CHI/00/G32, Santiago Njuguna A, Mbohwa C, Ntuli F, Belaid M, Seodigeng T, Ngila JC, Kinuthia C (2018) Waste to energy bio-digester selection and design model for the organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 82:1113–1121. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.051

 Pandey K, Soupir M (2012) Impacts of temperatures on biogas production in dairy manure anaerobic digestion. Int J Eng Technol 4:629–631. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijet.2012.v4.448

Peralta-Veran L, Juscamaita-Morales J, Meza-Contreras V (2016) Obtención y caracterización de abono orgánico líquido a través del tratamiento de excretas del ganado vacuno de un establo lechero usando un consorcio microbiano ácido láctico. Ecol Apl 15:1. https://doi.org/10.21704/rea.v15i1.577

Pérez-Pérez T, Pareda-Reyes I, Oliva-Merencio D, Zaiat M (2016) Anaerobic digestion technology for the treatment of pig manure. Cuba J Agric Sci 50:343–354

Rashid M, West J (2007) Dairy wastewater treatment with efective microorganisms and duckweed for pollutants and pathogen control. NATO Sci Peace Secur Ser. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6027-4_10

 Ribó-Herrero M (2004) Balance de macronutrientes y materia orgánica en el suelo de agro-sistemas hortícolas con manejo ecológico integrado. Repositori de Contingut Lliure Universitat de València

 Servin A (2004) Antagonistic activities of lactobacilli and bifdobacteria against microbial pathogens. FEMS Microbiol Rev 28:405– 440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsre.2004.01.003

 Sosa C (2015) Parámetros de control y monitoreo del proceso en digestores anaerobios de pequeña escala y diferentes tecnologías. Repositorio UCLV website

 Steinfeld H, Gerber P, Wassenaar T, Castel V, Rosales M, de Haan C (2006) Livestock’s long shadow: environmental issues and options. LEAD, Rome

United Nations, CEPAL (2016) Agenda 2030 y los objetivos de desarrollo sostenible Una oportunidad para América Latina y el Caribe. CEPAL, Santiago

Vandenverg P (1993) Lactic acid bacteria, their metabolic products and interference with microbial growth. FEMS Microbiol Rev 12:221–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.1993.tb00020.x

 Vásquez S, Suárez H, Zapata S (2009) Utilización de sustancias antimicrobianas producidas por bacterias acido lácticas en la conservación de la carne. Rev Chi 36:64–71

Velho VF, Mohedano RA, Filho P, Costa RH (2012) The viability of treated piggery wastewater for reuse in agricultural irrigation. Int J Recycl Org Waste Agric 1:10. https://doi. org/10.1186/2251-7715-1-10

VIOGAS (2016) Biogás en el sector lechero en Chile. Ministerio de Energía, Chile

WHO (2006) WHO guidelines for the safe use of wastewater, excreta and greywater, volume 1: policy and regulatory aspects. WHO press, Geneva

Yen-Phi VT, Clemens J, Rechenburg A et al (2009) Hygienic efects and gas production of plastic bio-digesters under tropical conditions. J Water Health 7:590–596. https://doi.org/10.2166/ wh.2009.127