Designing an Effective Professional Ethics Model in Training from the Perspective of Heads and Deputies of Education of Tehran Province

Curriculum Research

دوره 1، شماره 1، فروردین 2020، صفحه 100-109   

نوع مقاله: Original Article

نویسندگان

Shiva Momayez¹؛ Mahmoud Safari^{* 2}؛ MohammadNaghi Imani²

¹PhD Student of Educational Management, Department of Educational Sciences, Damavand Branch, Islamic Azad University, Damavand, Iran

²Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Damavand Branch, Islamic Azad University, Damavand, Iran

چکیده

Purpose: The aim of the present research was to design an effective professional ethics model in training from the perspective of heads and deputies of education in Tehran province.
Methods: This study in terms of purpose was applied and in terms of implementation method was mixed (qualitative and quantitative). The research population in both qualitative and quantitative sections was the heads and deputies of education in 2019-20 academic years. The research sample in the qualitative section according to the theoretical saturation principle was 40 people who were selected by purposive sampling method and in the quantitative section according to Cochran's formula were 230 people who were selected by multi-stage cluster sampling method. The research instruments were the semi-structured interview and a researcher-made questionnaire whose psychometric indicators were confirmed. Data were analyzed using methods of open, axial, and selective coding, exploratory factor analysis, and structural equation modeling in SPSS and LISREL software.
Finding: The results of both qualitative and quantitative sections showed that effective professional ethics in training had 40 indicators and 9 components including self-efficacy, scientific responsibility, individual ethics, managerial factors, organizational factors, job ethics, extra-organizational factors, social responsibility, and belonging to the scientific society. Also, the effective professional ethics model in training had a good fit and all 9 components had a significant effect on the mentioned model (P <0.05).
Conclusion: According to the results, planning to improve the effective professional ethics in education is necessary by experts and planners. As a result, they can enhance the components of self-efficacy, scientific responsibility, individual ethics, managerial factors, organizational factors, job ethics, extra-organizational factors, social responsibility, and belonging to the scientific society

کلیدواژه‌ها

Professional Ethics؛ Training؛ Heads and Deputies؛ Education

مراجع

Adler AH. (2014). Professional ethics and employability: Problems expressed by university teachers in Mexico and Spain. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 139, 175-181.
Bagherianpour M. (2020). Application of professional ethics components in faculty members. Ethics in Science and Technology, 14(4), 121-130.
Brett AS, McCullough LB. (2018). Getting past words: Futility and the professional ethics of life-sustaining treatment. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 60(3), 319-327.
Campbell E. (2008). The ethics of teaching as a moral profession. Curriculum Inquiry, 38(4), 357-385.
Chokprajakchat S, Sumretphol N. (2017). Implementation of the code of professional ethics for Thai civil servants. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38(2), 129-135.
Elena S. (2011). Reflective capability – a specific goal of a teachers professional ethics course. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 11, 145-149.
Ghanbarpour O, Abbasian H, Araste H, Nave Ebrahim A. Designing the pattern of teachers' professional ethics: A mixed methods study. Quarterly Journal of Educational Innovation, 18(1), 33-60.
Keykha.A, Imanipour M. (2020). Meta-synthesis of professional ethics elements in higher education. Journal of Medical Education Development, 15(1), 53-70.
Khani Jazani J, Jafari S, Arab A. (2019). Identifying and prioritizing professional ethics indicators in research. Ethics in Science and Technology, 14(3), 99-107.
Loach BL. (2019). A time to speak and a time to keep silent: Professional ethics, conscience, and the medical interpreter. Ethics, Medicine and Public Health, 11, 52-59.
Ngang TK, Chan TC. (2015). The importance of ethics, moral and professional skills of novice teachers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 205, 8-12.
Thirumoorthy T. (2017). The ethics of medical education - The ethical and professional issues in teaching and learning medicine. Annals Academy of Medicine, 46(9), 331-332.
Sattati S, Attarzadeh R. (2018). Evaluation of professional ethics components and their relationship with teachers job burnout. Journal of Teacher's Professional Development, 3(3), 1-17.
Shayestefard R, Gholami A. (2020). Professional ethics of teaching and the appropriate attitude in educating students. Quarterly Journal of Extension in Ethics, 16(38), 85-112.
Sheikhi M, Adib Y, Habibi H, Mahmoudi F. (2019). Identify and explain the experience of education professionals and student teachers in the process of identifying and shaping professional ethics. Journal of Education Strategies in Medical, 12(1), 123-129.
Svensson G, Wood G. (2004). Codes of ethics best practice in the Swedish public sector. The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 17(2), 178-195.
Wilson R. (2021). Ethical issues in teledentistry: Following the American dental association principles of ethics and code of professional conduct. The Journal of the American Dental Association, 152(2), 176-177.
Yazdani S., Imanipour M. (2018). Professional ethics in higher education: dimensions and constructs. Teb Va Tazkieh, 26(4),272-284.
Yuren T, Arnaz JA. (2014). Professional ethics and employability in higher education policies in Mexico: An analysis of the discourse. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 139, 182-188.