Impact of Elementary Learners’ L1 in Consciousness-raising Tasks on Their L2 Writing Accuracy

International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research

دوره 10، شماره 42، دی 2022، صفحه 149-157   

نوع مقاله: Research Papers

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30495/jfl.2022.692666

نویسندگان

Saeideh Fatahzade؛ Sajad Shafiee^* ؛ Fariba Rahimi Esfahani

Department of English, Shahrekord Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord, Iran

چکیده

While the main focus of the studies in the literature is centered around EFL teachers’ identity construction in face-to-face classes regarding certain cliche factors, the COVID-19 pandemic demonstrated the potential of investigating EFL teachers' professional identity reflection in the developing contexts of distance education. Thus, this study examined the possible association between Iranian EFL instructors' Professional Identity Reflection (PIR) and their use of Achievement Orientation Strategies (AOSs) in the dynamic setting of E-teaching. Besides, this study evaluated the prediction power of the AOSs in determining the PIR of Iranian EFL instructors. One hundred four male and female Iranian EFL instructors were selected based on convenience sampling to participate in this quantitative correlational research. Two instruments, including Measure of Teachers Achievement (MoTA) and Questionnaire of Professional Identity (QPI), were used to collect the required data on the online platform of Type form. The R software's correlation and multiple regression packages were utilized to analyze the gathered data. The results indicated a robust direct association between the PIR of Iranian EFL instructors in E-teaching and their use of AOSs. Moreover, three out of four AOSs significantly predicted the PIR of Iranian EFL instructors in E-Teaching. Furthermore, the mastery-approach strategy had the most predicting power among the other AOSs. This study provides practical interdisciplinary benefits for EFL teachers, EFL teacher trainers, and educational psychologists in training EFL teachers who are aware of how their views toward achieving specific academic goals in E-teaching influence their professional identity in E-teaching.
 
 

کلیدواژه‌ها

Achievement Theory؛ E-teaching؛ Iranian EFL Teachers؛ Professional Identity

مراجع

Alcon-Soler, E. (2005). Does instruction work for learning pragmatics in the EFL context? System, 33(3), 417-435.

Alegría de la Colina, A., García Mayo, M.D. (2009). Oral interaction in task-based EFL learning: The use of the L1 as a cognitive tool. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 47(3–4), 325–345.

Arshad, Z., Abdolrahimpour, M., Najafi, M, R., (2015). The Use of L1 as a Consciousness-raising Tool in Teaching Grammar to Beginner and Upper-intermediate EFL Students. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 6(3), 633-638.

Behrouzi, P., Kazemirad, F. (2012). The effect of consciousness-raising tasks on Iranian elementary EFL learners' syntax acquisition. International Journal of Linguistics, 4(2), 334-341.

Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching (4^th edn.). White plains, NY: Pearson Education

Butzkamm, W. (2003). We only learn language once: The role of the mother tongue in FL classrooms - death of a dogma. Language Learning Journal, 28, 29-39.

Cook, V. (2001). Second language learning and language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Ellis, R. (1993). Naturally simplified input, comprehension and second language acquisition. In M. Tickoo (Ed.), Simplification theory and application. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.

Ellis, R. (1997). SLA research and Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ellis, R., Hill, K. (2000). Run It Past Rod: An Interview with Rod Ellis. In Lee, Bill, and Swanson, Malcolm, (eds). The Language Teacher, Tokyo: Japan Association for Language Teaching.

Ellis, R. (2002). Grammar teaching–practice or consciousness-raising? In J. C. Richards, & W. A. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice (pp. 167-174).  Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Eslami-Rasekh, Z. (2005). Raising the pragmatic awareness of language learners. ELT Journal, 59(3), 199-208.

Fotos, S., Ellis, R. (1991). Communicating about Grammar: a Task-based Approach. TESOL Quarterly, 25(4), 605 - 628.

Fotos, S. (1994). Integrating grammar instruction and communicative language use through grammar consciousness-raising tasks. TESOL Quarterly, 28(2), 323-351.

Gomez Martinez, S., Fuertes Olivera, P.A. (2003). A Revision of the Role L1 Plays in Second Language Learning. In P. A. García & J. R. Fernández Suárez (Eds.), Estudios de Filología Inglesa. Homenaje al Profesor José María Ruiz (pp. 193-205). Valladolid: University of Valladolid.

Schweers, C. W. (1999). Using L1 in the L2 Classroom. English Teaching Forum, 37(2): 6–9

Larsen-Freeman, D. (2000). Techniques and principles in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Moradkhan, D., Sohrabian, R. (2009). Grammatical Consciousness-Raising Tasks and the Improvement of Iranian Students’ Knowledge of Grammar. Journal of Teaching English as a Foreign Language and Literature, 1(4), 57-71.

Nation, P. (2003). The role of the first language in foreign language learning. Asian EFL Journal, 5(2), 1-8.

Nosratinia, M., Roustayi, S. (2014). The Effect of Grammar Consciousness-Raising Tasks on EFL Learners' Reading Comprehension and Writing Ability. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science. 19(3), 203-216.

O’Brien, J. (2015). Consciousness-raising, Error Correction and Proofreading. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 15(3), 85-103.

Roza, V. (2014). A Model of Grammar Teaching Through Consciousness-raising Activities. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature, 2(3), 1-5.

Richards, J. C. (2002). Addressing the grammar gap in task work. In J. C. Richards, & W. A. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice (pp. 153-166). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Scott, V. M., De la Fuente, M. J. (2008). What is the problem? L2 learners’ use of the L1 during consciousness-raising form-focused tasks. The Modern Language Journal, 92(1), 100-113.

Smith, M.S. (1981). Consciousness-raising and the second language learner. Applied Linguistics, 2(2), 159-168.

Tang, J. (2002). Using L1 in the English classroom. English Teaching Forum, 40(1), 36-43.

Takimoto, M. (2006). The effects of explicit feedback and form–meaning processing on the development of pragmatic proficiency in consciousness-raising tasks. System, 34(4), 601-614.

Tajeddin, Z., Hosseinpur, R. M. (2014). The Role of Consciousness-Raising Tasks on EFL Learners' Microgenetic Development of Request Pragmatic Knowledge. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 147-187.

Thornbury, S. (1999) How to Teach Grammar. Harlow: Longman.

Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. New York: Cambridge University Press.