Exploring Iranian Translators’ Conception of Research: Education Level in Focus

Journal of Language and Translation

دوره 13، شماره 2، تیر 2023، صفحه 1-14   

نوع مقاله: Research Articles

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30495/ttlt.2023.703215

نویسندگان

Mohadese Karimi؛ Neda Fatehi Rad^*

Department of English Language, Kerman Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kerman, Iran

چکیده

Abstract
This study aimed at exploring Iranian B.A-level and M.A-level translators’ conceptions of research and investigating whether translators’ conceptions of research are different in terms of their education level. To this aim, a survey descriptive method was employed. Sample of the study included 60 M.A and B.A students of translation (30 males and 30 females) from different branches of Islamic Azad University. This selection was done based on convenience sampling. The data of this study were collected using Meyer, Shanahan and Laugksch’s (2007) questionnaire. Analysis of data was done using qualitative content analysis of the data. Results of data analysis showed that B.A-level and M.A-level translators have their own conceptions of research. Also, it was found that the participants’ conceptions of research were different in terms of their education level. In a more specific sense, M.A-level translators’ conceptions of research were more scientific and technical.
Keywords: Conception; Research; Translator; Translation

کلیدواژه‌ها

Keywords: Conception؛ Research؛ Translator

مراجع

Akerlind, G. S. (2005). Growing and developing as a university researcher. Higher Educa-tion, 55(2), 241-254.
Ashworth, P., & Lucas, U. (2000). Achieving empathy and engagement: a practical approach to the design, conduct and reporting of phenomenographic research. Studies in Higher Education, 25(3), 295-308.
Brew, A. (2001). Perceptions of research: A phenomenographic study. Studies in Higher Education, 26(3), 271–285.
Brew, A., Boud, D., Namgung, S.U., Lucas, L., & Crawford, K. (2015). Research productivity and academics’ perceptions of research. Higher education, 71(5), 681-697.
Bruce, D., & Bahrick, H.P. (1992). Perceptions of past research. American Psychologist, 47, 319–328.
Byrne-Armstrong, H., Higgs,J., & Horsfall, D. (2004). Critical moments in qualitative research. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Elzinga, A. (1985). Research, bureaucracy and the drift of epistemic criteria’, in the University research system: The public policies of the home of scientists, Wittrock B and Elzinga A. (Eds.) Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.
Godin, B. (2000). Measuring science: is there ‘basic research’ without statistics?’ Project on the History and Sociology of S&T Indi-cators.
Gummett, P. (1991). The Evolution of science and technology policy: a UK perspective. Sci-ence and Public Policy, 18(1), 31-37.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1989). Spoken and written language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jenkins, A., Blackman, T., Lindsay, R., & Paton-Saltzberg, R. (1998) Teaching and re-search: student perspectives and policy implications. Studies in Higher Education, 23, 127–141.
Kawulich, B., Garner, M.W.J., & Wagner, C. (2008). Students’ perceptions – and misper-ceptions – of research.” Paper presented at the annual conference of the International Sociological Association, Research Com-mittee 33, Sept. 1-7, 2008, Naples, Italy.
Kiley, M., & Mullins, G. (2005). Supervisors’ per-ceptions of research: What are they? Scan-dinavian Journal of Educational Research, 49(3), 245–262.
Longman Dictionary. (1981). Hertfordshire: Pren-tice Hall.
Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997) Learning and awareness. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erl-baum.
McCormack, C. (2004). Tensions between student and institutional perceptions of postgraduate research. Studies in Higher Education, 29 (3), 319-334. Meyer, J. H., Shanahan, M. P., & Laugksch, R. C. (2007). Students’ perceptions of re-search. 2: An exploration of contrasting patterns of variation. Scandinavian Jour-nal of Educational Research, 51(4), 415-433.
Meyera, J.H.F., Shanahan, M.P., & Laugkschc, R.C. (2005). Students’ perceptions of re-search: A qualitative and quantitative analy-sis. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 49 (3), 225–244.
Mowery, D., & Rosenberg, N. (1989). Technology and the pursuit of economic growth. Cam-bridge: CUP. Murtonen, M., & Lehtinen, E. (2003). Difficul-ties experienced by education and sociol-ogy students in quantitative methods courses. Studies in Higher education, 28(2), 171-185.
National Science Board. (2000). Science and Engineering Indicators 2000. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office (NSB 00-1).
OECD. (1994). The measurement of scientific and technical activities: Proposed stand-ard practice for surveys of research and experimental development. Paris: OECD.
Vermunt, J. D. (2005). Perceptions of research and methodology learning: a commentary on the special issue. Scandinavian Journal of Edu-cational Research, 49 (3), 329-334.
Woody, R. (2004). Misperceptions about scientific research in music education. Teaching Mu-sic 11 (5),66-73.
Ziman, J. (1994). Prometheus bound. Cambridge: CUP.