Investigating the Effects of a Guided- Autonomy Syllabus on Motivation from the Self Determination Theory Perspective

Journal of Teaching English Lnaguage Studies

دوره 8، شماره 2، آذر 2023، صفحه 179-219   

نوع مقاله: Original Article

نویسندگان

Abbas Ali Rezaee؛ Maryam Pahlevan Aqajooni

University of Tehran

چکیده

Motivation and autonomy in language learning are considered as the most fundamental and influential factors in second language learning. The study aimed at investigating the potential of a Guided Autonomy Syllabus to enhance motivation in the Iranian EFL context during a 3-month period. A revised and translated version of Academic Motivation Scale was distributed among students in the first and last session of the course in order to measure the change in students’ motivational orientations after autonomous learning intervention. The results of Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test indicated that all constructs of Intrinsic Motivation (IM-to know, IM-toward accomplishment, and IM- to experience stimulation), and two constructs of Extrinsic Motivation (identified regulation and introjected regulation) increased significantly after the autonomy treatment. On the other hand, the third construct of EM which is external regulation and Amotivation which is total lack of motivation decreased after the intervention. Generally, the findings of the study emphasize the effectiveness of the Guided Autonomy Syllabus on Motivation enhancement. The results particularly demonstrated a remarkable increase in intrinsic motivation after the autonomous learning intervention. Since intrinsic motivation highly correlates with achievement and success, providing students with autonomous learning program seems to be necessary.

کلیدواژه‌ها

Guided Autonomy؛ Intrinsic Motivation؛ Extrinsic Motivation؛ Self Determination Theory Perspective

مراجع

Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and research autonomy in language learning. Harlow, UK: Longman.

Best, J. W., & Kahn, J. V. (2006). Research in Education (10^th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education, inc.

Brass, P. (2010). Correction Codes. Retrieved April 12, 2014 from, http://www.teachitelt.com/index.php?CurrMenu=988&resource=14974. Pdf.

Breton, L. (1999). A guided-autonomy course to promote student implication.Bells: Barcelona English language and literature studies, 10, 119-131.

Broady, E., & Kenning, M. (1996). Learner autonomy: An introduction to the issue. In E. Broady, & M. Kenning (Eds.), Promoting learner autonomy in university language teaching (pp. 9-21). London, Middlesex University Printing Services.

Conttia, L. M. W. (2007). The influence of learner motivation on developing autonomous learning in an English-for-specific-purposes course (Doctoral dissertation, University of Hong Kong).

Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior.

 

New York: Plenum Press.

 

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology, 49(3), 183-185.

Dörnyei, Z. (2001). New themes and approaches in second language motivation research. In

 

Annual Review of Applied Linguistics (pp. 43-61). USA: Cambridge University Press.

 

Fukuda, S. T., Sakata, H., & Takeuchi, M. (2011). Facilitating autonomy to enhance motivation: Examining the effects of a guided-autonomy syllabus. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 8(1), 71-86.

Harmer, J. (1991). The practice of English language teaching. London/New York.

 

Horn, R. (n.d.). Intermediate statistics Wilcoxon test. Retrieved July 7, 2014 from, http://oak.ucc.nau.edu/rh232/courses/EPS625/Handouts/Nonparametric/The%20Wilcoxo

n%20Test. Pdf

 

Jones, L. (2007). The student-centered classroom (p. 41). Cambridge University Press.

 

Iimuro, A., & Berger, M. (2010). Introducing learner autonomy in a university English course.

 

Polyglossia, 19, 127-141.

 

Little, D. (1990). Autonomy in language learning. In Ian Gathercole (ed.) Autonomy in Language Learning. London

Little, D. (2007). Language learner autonomy: Some fundamental considerations revisited.

 

Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 14–29.

 

Magaldi, L. G. (2010). Metacognitive Strategies Based Instruction to Support Learner Autonomy in Language Learning. Revista canaria de estudios ingleses, (61), 73-86.

Niemiec, C. P., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom applying self-determination theory to educational practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 133-144

 

Ratelle, C. F., Guay, F., Vallerand, R. J., Larose, S., & Senécal, C. (2007). Autonomous, controlled, and amotivated types of academic motivation: A   person-oriented analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(4), 734.

Scharle, Ả., & Szabό, A., (2000). Learner Autonomy: A guide to developing learner responsibility.

 

Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

 

Spratt, M., Humphreys, G., & Chan, V. (2002). Autonomy and motivation: Which comes first?. Language Teaching Research, 6(3), 245-266.

Thanasoulas, D. (2000). Autonomy and learning: An epistemological approach.Applied Semiotics Journal, 4(10), 115-132.

Ushioda, E. (2011). Why autonomy? Insights from motivation theory and research. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 5(2), 221-232.

Ushioda, E. (2007). Motivation, autonomy and sociocultural theory. In Learner autonomy 8: Teacher and learner perspectives, ed. P. Benson, 5_24. Dublin: Authentik.

Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Briere, N. M., Senecal, C., & Vallieres, E. F. (1992). The academic motivation scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education. Educational and psychological measurement, 52(4), 1003-1017.

Wenden, A. L. (1998). Learner Training in Foreign/Second Language Learning: A Curricular Perspective for the 21st Century.