Impact of Fully-Immersive Teaching (FIT) Vs. Conventional Communicative Language Teaching on the Articulation Skills of EFL Learners With Expressive Language Disorder (ELD)

Journal of Language and Translation

دوره 14، شماره 1، فروردین 2024، صفحه 131-147   

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30495/ttlt.2024.709394

نویسندگان

Mojgan Khaki¹؛ Hossein Heidari Tabrizi^{* 1}؛ Sajad Shafiee²

¹Department of English, Isfahan( Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran

²English Department, Shahrekord Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord, Iran

چکیده

Based on the tenets of the cognitive theory of multimedia learning, the purpose of this research was to investigate the impact of Fully-Immersive Teaching (FIT) vs. conventional communicative language teaching on the articulation abilities of Iranian EFL learners diagnosed with Expressive Language Disorder (ELD). Purposively choosing 36 Iranian pre-intermediate EFL learners who had mild to moderate levels of ELD, we used a quasi-Solomon four-group design and separated them into two experimental and two control groups. The intervention included twenty sessions of seventy minutes each and comprised of eighty microlearning speech exercises that were developed in VR by FIT. The participants in the control group were given instruction based on Communicative Language Teaching (CLT), which is an approach to language education. Both the OQPT and the Wechsler Individual Achievement Test (WIAT-III) were used in this study's pre-testing and post-testing procedures. The results showed that individuals who were instructed in accordance with FIT performed better than their colleagues who had been subjected to CLT in terms of articulation abilities. These skills included expressive vocabulary, oral word fluency, and sentence repeats. TEFL, therapeutic education, cognitive speech therapy, and instructional technology might all stand to gain from the outcomes.

کلیدواژه‌ها

EFL learners؛ expressive language disorder؛ expressive vocabulary؛ oral fluency؛ sentence repetition

مراجع

Anderson, A. (2019). Virtual reality, augmented reality and artificial intelligence in special education: a practical guide to supporting students with learning differences. Routledge.

Aykac, M. (2005). Students' and teachers' attitudes towards the use of computer-mediated communication voice & text chat as an instructional resource to improve speaking skills. Bilkent Publication.

Brundage, S. B. (2007). Virtual reality augmentation for functional assessment and treatment of stuttering. Topics in Language Disorders, 27(3), 254-271. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.TLD.0000285359.41168.f1

Clark, R. C., Nguyen, F., & Sweller, J. (2011). Efficiency in learning: Evidence-based guidelines to manage cognitive load. John Wiley & Sons.

Cobb, S., Beardon, L., Eastgate, R., Glover, T., Kerr, S., Neale, H., & Wilson, J. (2002). Applied virtual environments to support learning of social interaction skills in users with Asperger's Syndrome. Digital Creativity, 13(1), 11-22. https://doi.org/10.1076/digc.13.1.11.3208

Fernandez-Fontecha, A. (2021). The role of learner creativity in L2 semantic fluency. An exploratory study. System, 103(2), 102-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102658

Ffiske, P. T. (2020). The immersive reality revolution: How virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), and mixed reality (MR) will revolutionise the world. Independent Publication.

Grechuta, K., Rubio, B., Duff, A., Oller, E. D., Pulvermuller, F., & Verschure, P. F. M. J. (2016). Intensive language-action therapy in virtual reality for a rehabilitation gaming system. Pain Management, 9(3), 243-252.

Hill, C., & Parry, K. (2014). From testing to assessment: English an international language. Cambridge.

Horvath, M., Dániel, C., Stark, J., & Lanyi, C. S. (2009). Virtual reality house for rehabilitation of aphasic clients. Transactions on Edutainment, 14(3), 231-239. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11245-4_20

Jones, P., Osborne, T., Sullivan-Drage, C., Keen, N., & Gadsby, E. (2022). Virtual reality methods: A guide for researchers in the social Sciences and humanities. Policy Press.

Kay, L. (2020). Therapeutic approaches in art education. Davis Publication.

Kempton, K. (2022). Supporting children with DLD: A picture book and user guide to learn about developmental language disorder. Routledge.

Kessy, H. (2020). Effect of multimedia instructional materials in open and distance learning. Grin Verlag.

Klem, M., Melby‐Lervåg, M., Hagtvet, B., Lyster, S. A. H., Gustafsson, J. E., & Hulme, C. (2015). Sentence repetition is a measure of children's language skills rather than working memory limitations. Developmental Science, 18(1), 146-154. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12202

Kohnke, L. (2023). Microlearning as a teaching and learning approach: using technology to design ESL/EFL microlearning activities. Springer.

Kostyk, A., Dessart, L., & Cowan, K. (2022). The reality of virtual experiences: Semantic and episodic memory formation in VR. Virtual Reality and Mixed Reality, 14(6), 213-217.

Kouroupetroglou, C. (2014). Enhancing the human experience through assistive technologies and e-accessibility. IGI Global.

Lahiri, U. (2020). Design of virtual reality-based applications in autism intervention. A computational view of autism: Using virtual reality technologies in autism intervention. Springer.

Llaudet, E., & Imai, K. (2022). Data analysis for social science: A friendly and practical introduction. Princeton University Press.

Mayer, R. E. (2020). Multimedia learning. Cambridge.

Nastajus, V. (2021). Exploring the use of virtual reality in episodic memory research. Leicester Publication.

Noordman-Vonk, W. (2013). Retrieval from semantic memory. Springer Science & Business Media.

Owens, E. R. (2022). Language disorders: A functional approach to assessment and intervention in children. Plural Publishing.

Sabry, F. (2022). Virtual reality: Taking the concept of augmented reality to the next level by creating a fully computer-generated simulation of a different world. One Billion Knowledge.

Tashakkori, A., Johnson, R. B., & Teddlie, C. (2020). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Sage Publications.

Turk, A., & Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (2020). Speech timing: Implications for theories of phonology, phonetics, and speech motor control. Oxford University Press.

Umanski, D., Kogovsek, D., Ozbic, M., & Schiller, N. O. (2010). Development of a voice-based rhythm game for training speech motor skills of children with speech disorders. Disability, Virtual Reality and Associated Technologies, 19(4), 255-262.

Van Engelenburg, B. (1999). Statistical analysis for the Solomon four-group design. OMD Research, 14(2), 1-37.

Weinbaum, C., Landree, E., Blumenthal, M. S., Piquado, T., & Gutierrez, C. I. (2018). Ethics in scientific research: An examination of ethical principles and emerging topics. Rand Publication.

Xie, B., Liu, H., Alghofaili, R., Zhang, Y., Jiang, Y., Lobo, F. D., & Yu, L. F. (2021). A review on virtual reality skill training applications. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 2(14), 56-69. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2021.645153  

Yang, X., Lin, L., Cheng, P. Y., Yang, X., Ren, Y., & Huang, Y. M. (2018). Examining creativity through a virtual reality support system. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(2), 1231-1254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9604-z