تحلیلی بر وضعیت موجود و مطلوب تصمیم‌گیرندگان در فرایند طراحی و تدوین برنامه‌ درسی در آموزش صنعتی

پژوهش در برنامه ریزی درسی

مقاله 3، دوره 13، شماره 48، اردیبهشت 1395، صفحه 30-43   

نویسندگان

مرتضی کرمی^{* 1}؛ فاطمه ارفع²؛ فاطمه وفایی³

¹1دانشیار گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران

²2کارشناس ارشد تحقیقات آموزشی، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران

³3کارشناس ارشد برنامه‌ریزی درسی، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر با هدف تحلیل وضعیت موجود و مطلوب تصمیم‌گیرندگان در فرایند طراحی و تدوین برنامه‌درسی آموزش صنعتی انجام شد. جامعه پژوهش شامل مدیران آموزش 258 شرکت‌ صنعتی شهر مشهد بود 45 شرکت که دارای واحد آموزش مستقل و فعال بودند به روش هدفمند مورد بررسی قرار گرفت و از این بین، 25 شرکت با پژوهشگر همکاری کردند. روش پژوهش حاضر توصیفی ـ پیمایشی و ابزار جمع‌آوری داده‌ها، پرسشنامه محقق‌ساخته بود. در این پرسشنامه میزان اختیار تصمیم گیری سه گروه اصلی ذی نفع در آموزش صنعتی(واحد متقاضی برنامه آموزشی، واحد آموزش و مدرس) بر اساس 9 مؤلفه برنامه درسی در دو وضعیت موجود و مطلوب در طیفی 10 ارزشی مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. جهت تحلیل داده‌ها از آزمون t و تحلیل واریانس استفاده شد. یافته‌ها نشان داد که در وضعیت موجود مدرس دوره بیشترین میزان مشارکت در وضعیت مطلوب واحد آموزش بیشترین میزان مشارکت داشت. همچنین نتایج نشان داد که میانگین نمرات مشارکت هر یک از عوامل سه‌گانه تصمیم‌گیرنده در دو وضعیت موجود و مطلوب با یکدیگر تفاوت داشت و میزان مشارکت مورد انتظار برای هر یک از عوامل سه‌گانه در وضعیت مطلوب بیشتر بود. همچنین نتایج تحلیل واریانس یک‌راهه نشان داد که بین میانگین نمرات مشارکت عوامل سه‌گانه تصمیم‌گیرنده در دو وضعیت موجود و مطلوب تفاوت معناداری وجود داشت. علاوه بر این میزان مشارکت عوامل سه‌گانه در تصمیم‌گیری در شرکت‌های بزرگ، کوچک و متوسط با یکدیگر تفاوت نداشت.

کلیدواژه‌ها

آموزش صنعتی؛ تحلیل وضعیت موجود و مطلوب؛ تدوین برنامه‌درسی؛ طراحی برنامه‌درسی؛ تصمیم گیرندگان برنامه درسی

مراجع

Aminkhandaghi, M. dehghani, M.(2010). Reflecting on centralization, uncentralization return to centralization and review implications for curriculum system in Iran: new perspective. training and Psychology Studies, 11 (2): 165-184.(Persian) Aminkhndaghi, M. (2010). The importance and application of scientific findings on curriculum in courses offered by industrial companies. Journal of Curriculum Studies (J.C.S.), Vol.5 (19): 139-169. (Persian) Arthur, H., Baumann, M. (1996). Nursing curriculum content: an innovative decision-making process to define priorities. Nurse Education Today, 16 (1): 63-68. Ben-Peretz, M.(2011). Teacher knowledge: what is it? How do we uncover it? What are its implications for schooling? Teaching and teachereducation, 27(1): 3-9. Beyrami poor, A, liyaghat dar, M, sharif , M.(2008). Assess the effectiveness of teaching process - learning and assessment in English secondary school curriculum Shiraz. New Educational ideas. (4): 95-73. (Persian) Bokonjice, D., Sonntag, H.G., Steiner, Th.(2009). Manual of teaching and learning in medicine. Chapter 11, Cox, D.,Lawver, D.E., Baker, M., Doerfert, D.(2003). Critical water related curriculum needs as perceived by agricultural science teachers in programs located within the boundaries of the Ogallala aquifer. Journal of agricultural education, 45 (4): 22-33. Crişan, A., Enache, R.(2011). Designing customer oriented courses and curricula in higher education. A possible model. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, (11): 235–239. Farjad, M. (1995). Fundamentals of Educational and Curriculum Planning. Tehran: elham. (Persian) Fathi vajargah, K. (2004). Feasibility teachers participate in curriculum planning process in the education system of Iran. Journal of Educational Innovations, 3 (8): 59-78. (Persian) Fathi vajargah, K., shafie., N. (2007). The evaluation of university curriculum (adult curriculum). Journal of Curriculum Studies (J.C.S.),1(5): 1-26. (Persian) Goya, Z., Ezadi, S.(1381). Role of teachers in curriculum decision-making levels. Journal Scientific - research humanities azahra university, 12 (42): 147-173. (Persian) Ghahramani, M., Moradi, N.(2007). The developing a model outsourcing of organizational learning. Messeage of management, (25): 151-18. (Persian) Ghonoodi, A., Salimi, L.(2011). The study of elements of curriculum in smart schools. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28: 68 – 71. Ghorchian, N.(2008). the pivotal role of Education in the Country industrials. The journal of Planning and Budget, (6): 73-100. (Persian) Hamidi. F.(2007). the importance education in Organizations with emphasize on E-learning education. Journal of management, 18 (127-128): 140-145. (Persian) Harris, L. Driscoll, P., Lewis, M., Matthews, L., Russell, Ch.,Cumming, S.(2010). Implementing curriculum evaluation: case study of a generic undergraduate degree in health sciences. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35 ( 4): 477–490. Jamiri, V, hatami, J, fathi azar. E, pakdelfard, M.(2010). The review Conformity Assessment of Architectural Engineering curriculum with needs of labor market in iran. Journal of Higher Education Curriculum Studies, 1 (2): 111-133. (Persian) Javidi kalate jafarabadei, T.(2007) A negotiated curriculum model, new approach for the decentralization of secondary education, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 1 (4): 85-102. (Persian) Karami, M. (2010). Effectiveness of problem based approach in industrial training. Journal of Curriculum Studies (J.C.S.), Vol.5 (19): 89 -113. (Persian) Karami, M., bahman abadi, S., esmaeli, A. (2012). Review of the perspective of faculty members and curriculum specialists toward good conditions of the structure of optimal decision making in designing higher education curriculum. Research in curriculum planning, vol 9 (7): 92-104. (Persian) Kazem poor, E., Ghaffari, KH.(2009). The evaluation of implemented curriculum of social studies Secondary education branch of Theoretical with using of robital three-dimensional models. Journal a new approach in educational administration 2 (3): 89-108. (Persian) Keshavarzi, M., rahgozar, H. (2010). The place and role of curriculum in industrial training. Journal of Curriculum Studies (J.C.S.), Vol.5 (19): 170-185. (Persian) Kitchenham, B., Budgen, D., Brereton, P., Woodall, Ph.(2005), An investigation of software engineering curricula. The Journal of Systems and Software , (74): 325–335. Kosari, M., noroz zadeh, R. (2009). Defining characteristics of the curriculum four elements,of undergraduate with emphasis ontraining curriculum Entrepreneurship skills. Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, (54): 1-18. (Persian) Langley, C.J., Gibson, Th. E.(1997). Industry Evaluation of a Transportation/Logistics Curriculum. Transportation Journal , 17 (1): 33-39. Mehrmohamadi, M.(2002). research practice-based in curriculum planning process: Schwab pragmatic theory. Educational Innovations, 1 (1): 21-37. (Persian) Mehrmohamadi, M.(2008). Analysis of the policy of decentralization of curricula in higher education in Iran: necessities and opportunities. Iranian Journal of Higher Education, 1 (3): 1-11. (Persian) Mehrmohamadi, M.(2008). Curriculum perspective, Approaches and prospects. Mashhad: beh nashr. (Persian) Mikami, K., Taichi, W., Katsunori,Y., Kenji, O., AkinoriIto, M., Kawashima, R., Takeuchi, K., Mitsuru, K.(2010). Construction trial of a practical education curriculum for game development by industry–university collaboration in Japan. Computers & Graphics, (34): 791–799. ( Mustoe, L.(1995). industry Expected – But who shoule determine the curriculum?. European journal of engineering edcation, 20 (3): 313- 223. Parsa, A.(2007). Review Teachers' attitudes and behavioral tendencies in the development of new curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies,1(4): 103-138. (Persian) Price, L.(2004). Participatory curriculum development: lessons drawn from teaching environmental education to industry in Zimbabwe. Environmental Education Research,10 (3): 401- 407. Reeder, K. J.(2001). an overview of the industrial design cuuriculum. the technology teacher, 60 (8): 21-23. Saracaloglu, S.,Yilmaz, S., Cengel, M., Cogmen, S., karademir, C., kanmaz, A.(2010). Elementary teacher views about their roles in curriculum development and evaluation process. Procedia social and behavioral sciences, (2): 2427-2434. Shah ghale, S. (2011).Education, development and socialization. special in-service training of Social Sciences development, 15 (2): 39-45. (Persian) Sharifian, F., Sharif, S.M. Jafari, S.E. Mosa poor, N. (2010). The methods of partnership faculty in Graduate curriculum. journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, (57): 23-44. (Persian) Soltani, A.(2005). Need Assessment methods and models in the organization. Management, (105-106): 42-48. (Persian) Yang, M. Y., You, M., Chen, F. Ch. (2005). Competencies and ualifications for industrial design jobs: implications for design practice. education, and student career guidance, Design Studies , 26 (2): 1-35.